Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Gibson v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv09474
Plaintiff:
David Gibson
Defendant:
Warden Jane Doe, Warden Harvey, Nurse Medical Director Assistant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargas v. Warden
as 1:2023cv09348
Petitioner:
Jesus Vargas
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cole et al v. Nassau County Sheriff's Department Division of Correction et al
as 2:2023cv04097
Plaintiff:
Cregory Cole, Duane Greene, Kyle Williams and others
Defendant:
Nassau County Sheriff's Department Division of Correction and Nassau County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Ontaneda et al
as 6:2023cv06077
Plaintiff:
Tyrieke J. Bradley
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Ontaneda, Superintendent Burnett, CO Taddeo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Bradford et al
as 9:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
Bradford, Harrington, Lovely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Kessler et al
as 9:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
C.O. Kessler, Derocco, John Doe #6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. LaValley et al
as 9:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
LaValley, C.O. Kelly, Duray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Vargas v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv03063
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Medical Personal of Metropolitan Detention Center of Brooklyn, NY
Plaintiff:
Julio Acosta De Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01051
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Carlos Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
De Vargas v. USA
as 1:2020cv03884
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Julio Acosta De Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
