Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KEYSTONE AGENCY INVESTORS, LLC v. HAYDEN et al
as 2:2020cv01511
Defendant:
REBECCA VARGA, CSC INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS, INC., DANEEN HAYDEN and others
Plaintiff:
KEYSTONE AGENCY INVESTORS, LLC
OLIVANT et al v. VARGAS et al
as 2:2018mc00069
Movant:
CARLIE OLIVANT , BRENDA LOTT and GAIL SLOMINE
Respondent:
OMAR VARGAS, ROBERT BERTONE, MICHELLE HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
VARGAS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04558
Plaintiff:
MARIA VARGAS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Vargas et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2010mc00013
Plaintiff:
Ralph Vargas and Bland Ricky Roberts
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Fluid Music East West Communications, Inc. and Fluid Music East West Communications, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
East West Communications, Inc., East West Communications, Inc., Brian Transeau and others
VARGAS-ESPINAL v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2009cv04746
Plaintiff:
MARTIN VARGAS-ESPINAL
Defendant:
JANET A. NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
VARGAS v. SOUTHWARK METAL COMPANY
as 2:2008mc00149
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO VARGAS
Defendant:
SOUTHWARK METAL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
QUAKER CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. VARGA
as 2:2007cv02668
Plaintiff:
QUAKER CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
CHARLES VARGA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
