Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Goodmoney v. Board of County Commissioners
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Dominic Vaughn Goodmoney
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hinman v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00286
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Vaughn William Hinman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Risher v. J. Diamond Group, INC.
as 1:2017cv00547
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Risher
Defendant:
J. Diamond Group, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vaughn v. Board of County Commissioners of Cibola County et al
as 1:2016cv00556
Plaintiff:
Rheganne Vaughn
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Cibola County, Edward Michael, Walter Jaramillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguilar et al v. Management & Training Corporation
as 2:2016cv00050
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation
Plaintiff:
Marisela Aguilar , Miguel Blanco , Francisco J Carranza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vaughn Buren Incorporated et al v. Garrido et al
as 1:2014cv00961
Defendant:
Jorge Garrido, G & C Investment Corp., Peter Block and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Buren Incorporated and Altitude, hfc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75
Jaime v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2013cv00845
Plaintiff:
Ryan S. Jaime
Defendant:
Lee Vaughn, Don Russell, Mike Betrus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magana v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2013cv00211
Petitioner:
Jose Magana
Respondent:
FNU Vaughn, Corrections Corporation of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Galvan v. Vaughn
as 1:2012cv01026
Plaintiff:
Humberto Galvan
Defendant:
Lee Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Castro v. Vaughn
as 1:2012cv00965
Plaintiff:
Mariano Castro
Defendant:
Lee Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
