Cases 11 - 17 of 17
TAYLOR v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00882
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA TAYLOR
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SEDGWICK CMS, ATTORNEY CURTIS B. HANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROACH v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00406
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D. ROACH
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Klayman, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman, Charles Strange and Mary Ann Strange, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Keith Alexander and others
Larry Klayman, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Larry Elliott Klayman, Charles Strange and Mary Ann Strange, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Keith Alexander and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lowell C. McAdams, Roger Vinson and Verizon Communications Inc.
In re: Long-distance Telephone Servic
as 12-5380
In Re:
In re: Long-distance Telephone Service Federal Excise Tax Refund Litigation-MDL 1798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oscar Gurrola, Virginia Sloan, Gary M. Sable and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anthony Belloni
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, acting by and through the Internal Revenue Service, Verizon Communications Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
IN RE: LONG-DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE FEDERAL EXCISE TAX REFUND LITIGATION - MDL 1798
as 1:2007mc00014
Plaintiff:
OSCAR GURROLA, OSCAR GURROLA, OSCAR GURROLA and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
