Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Luksic o/b/o Jared Via v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Patricia Luksic o/b/o Jared Via
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Insurance King Agency, Inc. v. Paul Moss Insurance Agency, LLC
as 1:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Insurance King Agency, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul Moss Insurance Agency, LLC doing business as Insurancewins and operating via an Ohio Registered Tradename of Epiq Insurance Agency, Paul Moss and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Huntington National Bank v. VIA 652, LLC
as 5:2019cv00548
Defendant:
VIA 652, LLC
Plaintiff:
Huntington National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015dp20219
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Via Brown
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Welch et al v. United States et al
as 1:2012cv02238
Plaintiff:
Edward Welch, John Roosevelt Baccus, Patrick Strozier and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Benita Y. Pearson, Thomas J. McAvoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21185
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Via Brown
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Via v. Commissioner of SSA
as 3:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Dennis Via
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nichols v. General Motors Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00591
Plaintiff:
Carl Nichols and Carl Nichols
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation, General Motors Corporation via their statutory agent: CT Corporation, Fidelity Investments and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
