Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, and Annuity Funds et al v. VIF Corp.
as 1:2024cv01816
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, and Annuity Funds and The Trustees of the Local 1010 Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Training Fund
Defendant:
VIF Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Percy et al v. U & I Mechanical Corporation
as NYE/1:21-CV-02283
Defendant:
U & I Mechanical Corporation, Vamco Sheet Metal, Umbanet Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Percy, Albert E Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non- profit, as Class Representative,
Percy et al v. U & I Mechanical Corporation
as 1:2021cv02283
Defendant:
U & I Mechanical Corporation, Vamco Sheet Metal, Umbanet Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Albert E Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non- profit, as Class Representative,
Respondent:
James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, Annuity and Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Safety Funds et al v. VIF Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv04814
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company and VIF Corp.
Plaintiff:
The Highway, Road and Street Construction Laborers Local Union 1010 and Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, Annuity and Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Safety Funds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Safety Fund and Pension Funds v. VIF Corp.
as 1:2014cv04923
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, Annuity and Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Safety Funds
Defendant:
VIF Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
