Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Savannah Smith, et al v. City of Capitola, et al
as 19-16298
Defendant: JIM HART, Santa Cruz County Sheriff, NOE HERNANDEZ, Watsonville Police Officer, CHRIS VIGIL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAVANNAH SMITH, THANH-THANH HOANG, both individually and in her capacity as successor-in-interest to Luke Smith, deceased, LUKE SMITH, Deceased, through his Successor in Interest and others
Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF CAPITOLA and PEDRO ZAMORA, Capitola Police Officer
Savannah Smith, et al v. County of Santa Cruz, et al
as 19-16241
Defendant / Appellant: COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, CHRIS VIGIL, JEFFREY EISNER and others
Defendant: NOE HERNANDEZ, Watsonville Police Officer, JIM HART, Santa Cruz County Sheriff, PEDRO ZAMORA, Capitola Police Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAVANNAH SMITH, LUKE SMITH, Deceased, through his Successor in Interest, THANH-THANH HOANG, both individually and in her capacity as successor-in-interest to Luke Smith, deceased and others
Jose Vigil-Carballo v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71415
Petitioner: JOSE SELVIN VIGIL-CARBALLO
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Council on American-Islamic Relations-CA et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 2:2017cv07887
Plaintiff: American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Los Angeles, Council on American-Islamic Relations-CA and others
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation Los Angeles Field Office, Federal Emergency Management Agency and others
Jose Vigil-Carballo v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72889
Petitioner: JOSE SELVIN VIGIL-CARBALLO
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Jose Vigil-Carballo v. Jefferson Sessions, III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-70580
Petitioner: JOSE SELVIN VIGIL-CARBALLO
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Qualcomm Incorporated et al v. Telepet USA, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00515
Petitioner: Qualcomm Incorporated , Snaptracs, Inc. , Dudley Fetzer and others
Respondent: Telepet USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1
Armando Aguilar-Vigil v. Dana J. Boente We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-70077
Petitioner: ARMANDO AGUILAR-VIGIL, Armando Aguilar
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
USA v. Kimberly Hernandez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-50461
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KIMBERLY ANN HERNANDEZ, AKA Ramona Vigil
Estate of Betty Goldberg, et al v. Goss-Jewett Company, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56297
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: ESTATE OF BETTY GOLDBERG, DECEASED, by and through their successor in interest, Daniel Rubin and ESTATE OF AL GOLDBERG, DECEASED, by and through their successor in interest, Daniel Rubin
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee: ESTATE OF ROBERT W. SCHACK, Deceased, ESTATE OF BENJAMIN F. FOHRMAN, Deceased and ESTATE OF TERRENCE J. GEORGE, AKA Terry George, Deceased
Intervenor - Appellee: VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR TO CCI INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor to Insurance Company of North America, Century Indemnity Company, as successor to CCI Insurance Company, as successor to Insurance Company of North America and others
Defendant - Appellee: GOSS-JEWETT COMPANY, INC., AKA Tri-County Sales, Inc.
Defendant-cross-defendant - Appellee: DAROLD MERRITT, JAMES W. ROSS, AKA Terry George, Deceased and ARTHUR P. ARNS
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: DONALD J. GEORGE
Third-party-defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: PACIFIC ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
Third-party-defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee: CLAY SCOTT BRADFIELD
Third-party-defendant - Appellee: ST. PAUL CLEANERS & LAUNDRY, INC., COIT SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?