Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
In Re: Citigroup Inc. Securiti
as 16-2850
Plaintiff:
Tillie Saltzman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Public Employees' Retirement Association of Colorado, Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ATD Group
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc., Charles O. Prince, Robert E. Rubin and others
Objector - Appellant:
Theodore H. Frank
In Re: Citigroup Inc. Securiti
as 14-3014
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ATD Group, Tillie Saltzman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Public Employees' Retirement Association of Colorado and others
Appellant:
Gary L. Burgess and Joseph Icon
Defendant - Appellee:
Citigroup,Inc., Charles O. Prince, Robert E. Rubin and others
Rentokil-Initial Pension Schem v. Citigroup Inc.
as 14-2719
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Rentokil-Initial Pension Scheme, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
Sanford I. Weill, Charles O. Prince, III, Robert E. Rubin and others
Rentokil-Initial Pension Schem v. Citigroup Inc.
as 14-2545
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Rentokil-Initial Pension Scheme, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Citigroup Inc., Sanford I. Weill, Charles O. Prince, III and others
In Re: CitiGroup Inc. Bond Act
as 14-202
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension and Relief Fund, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Minneapolis Firefighters' Relief Association and others
Defendant:
Citigroup, Inc., Charles Prince, Sallie L. Krawcheck and others
Intervenor:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Objector - Appellant:
Lexie L. Hopson and Michelle B. Hopson
In Re: Citigroup Inc. Securiti
as 13-3710
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ATD Group, Tillie Saltzman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Public Employees' Retirement Association of Colorado and others
Appellant:
Kenneth Patrick Wright
Defendant:
Citigroup,Inc., Charles O. Prince, Robert E. Rubin and others
Moskal v. Pandit
as 13-3577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stanley Moskal, derivatively on behalf of Citigroup, Inc., Silvester Sciuto, derivatively on behalf of Citigroup Inc. and James Kenney, derivatively on behalf of Citigroup Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Vikram Pandit, John C. Gerspach, John P. Havens and others
In Re: Citigroup Inc. Securiti
as 13-3539
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ATD Group, Tillie Saltzman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Public Employees' Retirement Association of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Citigroup,Inc., Charles O. Prince, Robert E. Rubin and others
Objector:
Steve A. Miller, P.C. Profit Sharing Plan
Objector - Appellant:
Theodore H. Frank
In Re: Citigroup Inc. Securiti
as 13-3531
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ATD Group, Tillie Saltzman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Public Employees' Retirement Association of Colorado and others
Appellant:
Kenneth Patrick Wright
Defendant:
Citigroup,Inc., Charles O. Prince, Robert E. Rubin and others
Objector - Appellant:
Steve A. Miller, P.C. Profit Sharing Plan and Theodore H. Frank
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
