Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HORTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10872
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE W HORTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Horton v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01528
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Pamela W. Horton
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murphy v. Horton et al
as 5:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Patrick W. Murphy, III and Patrick W Murphy, III
Defendant:
Jeffery W Horton, JRW Trucking Inc, Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HORTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv63102
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES W HORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTON et al v. A.C. AND S. INC (ARMSTRONG CONTRCTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv82865
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
KATHY HORTON and J. W. HORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTON v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71798
Plaintiff:
YVONNE W. HORTON
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ANDREWS et al v. DUBOSE et al
as 2:2007cv73710
Plaintiff:
JAMES C ANDREWS, JOHNNY A BAKER, DARRELL E BATES and others
Defendant:
SAMUEL L DUBOSE, JR, OGLEBAY NORTON CO., OGLEBAY NORTON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ANDREWS et al v. ACANDS INC. et al
as 2:2007cv69223
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. ANDREWS, JOHNNY A. BAKER, DARRELL E. BATES and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC., ACANDS INC., ALLIED-SIGNAL TRANSPORTATION INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
