Cases 41 - 50 of 139
SHOPHER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2016cv00899
Plaintiff:
JUDY F. SHOPHER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McCALL v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2016cv00892
Plaintiff:
LORENE McCALL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
CHACON v. WAL-MART STORES INC.
as 1:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
JULIO L. CHACON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BARR v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
GLEN A. BARR
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
WRAY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2016cv00068
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
PRICE et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2015cv01890
Plaintiff:
CALVIN PRICE and CANDACE PRICE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
TREVINO et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 1:2015cv01358
Plaintiff:
DIANA TREVINO and JOSEPH TREVINO
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
KERR v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2015cv00932
Plaintiff:
DEMIRIS KERR
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
WIESMANN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 4:2015cv00038
Defendant:
MEDICARE, SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN WIESMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
LONG v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2015cv00383
Plaintiff:
FRANCINE L. LONG
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
