Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Gliadkovsky v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 3:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Ekaterina Gliadkovsky
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Morales v. Walmart Inc.
as 3:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
Natalia La Rosa, Phoebe Caneda, Keya Johnigan and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics GmBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Phamatech Incorporated v. Walgreen, Co. et al
as 3:2021cv01234
Plaintiff:
Phamatech Incorporated
Defendant:
Walgreen, Co. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Albright v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 3:2021cv00789
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff:
Jinette Albright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01913
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00408
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cobbs v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 3:2017cv01089
Plaintiff:
Dawn Cobbs
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unite Eurotherapy, Inc. v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 3:2016cv01706
Plaintiff:
Unite Eurotherapy, Inc.
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Walgreens.com, Inc. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Saechao, et al v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 3:2015cv00077
Petitioner:
Cheng Sio Saechao , Meytin Saechou , Yao Orn Saechou and others
Respondent:
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Amylin Pharmaceuticals LLC , Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
