Cases 1 - 10 of 228
HILL v. WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
REGINALD HILL
Respondent:
WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
METZLER v. WARDEN
as 4:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
JOSHUA METZLER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANDERS v. WARDEN FRANKLIN CI
as 4:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
TERRY SANDERS
Respondent:
WARDEN FRANKLIN CI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BREADON v. HEWETT
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
EMANUEL BREADON
Respondent:
WARDEN HEWETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDREWS v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANDREWS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and WARDEN OF APALACHEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28143
Plaintiff:
SHAY WARDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAURETI v. WARDEN FCI-MIAMI et al
as 4:2023cv00435
Petitioner:
MARCO LAURETI
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI-MIAMI and O LUA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WARDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12062
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ROBERT WARDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WARDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10654
Plaintiff:
RONALD KIRKLAND WARDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06747
Plaintiff:
WARDEN WILLIAM DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
