Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Barker v. McKenzie
as 3:2022cv00613
Petitioner:
Adam Anthony Barker
Respondent:
Warden Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Crews et al
as 5:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ruffin
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Warden Scott Jordan, Caleb Alverio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McIntosh v. Ky D.O.C. et al et al
as 3:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
James McIntosh
Defendant:
Ky D.O.C. et al, Warden Furguson, Medical Staff, RCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gonzalas et al
as 3:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Johnson and Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Captain Gonzalas, Major Travis St Clair, HSA John Brinker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaballah v. McKenzie
as 3:2022cv00464
Petitioner:
Conrai Andre Kaballah
Respondent:
Warden Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Robey
as 1:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Jeffery Carpenter
Respondent:
Warden Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Robey
as 1:2022cv00095
Petitioner:
Jeffery Carpenter
Respondent:
Warden Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gabbard v. Green
as 4:2022cv00091
Petitioner:
Grover Clifton Gabbard
Respondent:
Warden David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stepp v. Mazza
as 3:2022cv00368
Petitioner:
Chad Aaron Stepp
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larrabee v. Gilley
as 1:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Larrabee
Respondent:
Warden J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
