Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner: Richard N. King
Respondent: Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner: Terrez L. Carter
Respondent: Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schubert v. Watson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv04231
Petitioner: Alan Schubert
Respondent: Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fenderson v. Management & Training Corp. et al.
as 3:2023cv02119
Plaintiff: Tayke Fenderson
Defendant: Management & Training Corp., Warden Tom Watson, Daniel Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilkes v. Watson
as 5:2023cv01773
Petitioner: Joseph Wilkes
Respondent: Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lask v. Watson
as 3:2023cv01381
Petitioner: Richard Lask
Respondent: Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James HowardIn re: James Howard
as 23-3453
Petitioner: In re: JAMES MICHAEL HOWARD
Respondent: WARDEN TOM WATSON
Howard v. Watson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00861
Petitioner: James M. Howard
Respondent: Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. Watson
as 5:2023cv00407
Petitioner: Robert Bowen
Respondent: Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfred Johnson, Sr. v. Management Training Corporation, et al
as 22-4032
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALFRED JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: MANAGEMENT TRAINING CORPORATION, DEPUTY WARDEN JAMES CRAIG, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, ANITA EDMONSTONE, Case Manager and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?