Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06747
Plaintiff:
WARDEN WILLIAM DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEE et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
GARY LEE, JEREMIAH LORD, JEREMIAH BAKER and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Demps v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Jamal Demps
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Mr. Hodgeson, Clara Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2021cv81906
Plaintiff:
Dexter Davis
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, South Bay Correctional Facility, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv00747
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WARDEN WILLIAM DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fuentes v. Charlotte Correctional Institution Correctional Officers et al
as 2:2020cv00902
Defendant:
Charlotte Correctional Institution Correctional Officers and Assistant Warden Williams
Plaintiff:
Yoandris Rosales Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Michael D. Crews et al
as 3:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tony Romano
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Michael D. Crews, South Florida Reception Center (S.F.R.C.) Warden John Doe (1), Intake Officer John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2008cv81236
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Wood
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Nurse Casey, Officer Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
