Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WMATC v. Reliable Limousine Service, LL, et al
as 13-7161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
Defendant - Appellant:
Reliable Limousine Service, LLC, doing business as Reliable Limousine Service and Paul Benjamin Rodberg
Executive Technology Solutions v. WMATC
as 13-1239
Petitioner:
Executive Technology Solutions, LLC
Respondent:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
WMATC v. Reliable Limousine Service, LL, et al
as 13-7072
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
Defendant - Appellant:
Reliable Limousine Service, LLC and Paul Benjamin Rodberg
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION v. RELIABLE LIMOUSINE SERVICE, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00576
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION
Defendant:
RELIABLE LIMOUSINE SERVICE, LLC and PAUL BENJAMIN RODBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION v. WASHINGTON DC BUS CHARTER LLC
as 1:2011cv01753
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DC BUS CHARTER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LaNita Hood v. WMATC
as 08-1140
Petitioner:
LaNita Hood and Links Enterprises and Investments, LLC
Respondent:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
Shonka v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority et al
as 1:2008cv00047
Plaintiff:
Natalie N. Shonka
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Bonita Curry and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Old Twn Trolley v. WMATC, et al
as 96-1069
Petitioner:
Old Town Trolley Tours of Washington, Inc.
Terminated Party:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Respondent:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
Intervenor:
Double Decker Bus Tours W.D.C., Inc., trading as Double Decker Bus Washington, D.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
