Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Derek Tucson, et al v. City of Seattle, et al
as 23-35449
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEREK TUCSON, ROBIN SNYDER, MONSIEREE DE CASTRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF SEATTLE
Defendant:
ALEXANDER PATTON, TRAVIS JORDAN, DYLAN NELSON and others
Amicus Curiae:
WASHINGTON STATE ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL ATTORNEYS, AND THE INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC DEFENSE
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. Cangress, et al
as 21-55408
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES VAN SCOY, KARYN PINSKY, CHARLES MALOW and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES and JOSUE TIGUILA
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Intervenor:
CANGRESS, DBA Los Angeles Community Action Network (LA CAN)
Amicus Curiae:
HOPE STREET COALITION, INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES and others
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55404
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES VAN SCOY, KARYN PINSKY, CHARLES MALOW and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES and JOSUE TIGUILA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES, WOMEN IN SKID ROW and others
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55395
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES VAN SCOY, KARYN PINSKY, CHARLES MALOW and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES and JOSUE TIGUILA
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES, WOMEN IN SKID ROW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
