Other Statutes Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
WATKINS et al v. PARKER et al
as 2:2023cv02811
Plaintiff: GARY WATKINS and SURPASS INVESTING LLC
Defendant: GREG PARKER, GREGORY PARKER, JR, DANIELLE MORRIS-PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WATKINS v. WALGREENS et al
as 2:2017cv04448
Plaintiff: ALEXANDRA WATKINS
Defendant: WALGREENS and WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrams et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01346
Plaintiff: Robert C Abrams, Jr. , Sonya M Abrams , James M Allen and others
Defendant: Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Watkins v. Synchrony Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00842
Plaintiff: Staci Watkins
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02059
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WATKINS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 2:2014mc00055
Petitioner: TAMMY WATKINS
Respondent: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: Motion for Confirmation of Arbitration Award
WATKINS v. LERRO CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00035
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER WATKINS
Defendant: LERRO CORPORATION and MOROCCO ELECTRIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00983
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06832
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?