Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WILD WAVES, LLC v. PHILADELPHIA CONTRIBUTIONSHIP INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv01194
Plaintiff:
WILD WAVES, LLC
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CONTRIBUTIONSHIP INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2250
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00289
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06617
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05979
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4211
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05579
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Scottsdale Insurance v. Andrew Weiner, et al
as 10-1747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE, as subrogee of Nickels Midway Pier, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW E. WEINER, JAY PETKOV, WILD WAVES LLC and others
Scottsdale Insurance v. Andrew Weiner, et al
as 10-1652
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE, as subrogee of Nickels Midway Pier, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW E. WEINER, JAY PETKOV and WILD WAVES LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
AMC PLUMBING & HEATING, DANIEL MULLEN, DAVID MULLEN, SR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00141
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
