Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wilkins-Scott v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2016cv01123
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Debra Wilkins-Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lloyd v. Rose et al
as 5:2014cv03137
Plaintiff:
Todd J. Lloyd
Defendant:
Trish Rose, Don Wilkins and Keith Shroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Kansas Department of Labor
as 6:2012cv01363
Plaintiff:
Jack Wilkins
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2012cv02283
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wilkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wilkins v. Six et al
as 5:2009cv03182
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Wilkins
Respondent:
Steven Six and David McKune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Neese et al
as 2:2007cv02358
Plaintiff:
Jean W. Neese, Jean W. Neese, Cecil R. Wilkins and others
Defendant:
Abercrombie Oil Company, Inc., Abercrombie Oil Company, Inc., BP Products North America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
In Re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litigation
as 2:2007md01840
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., TravelCenters of America, LLC, Brown-Thompson General Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Cockrell, Jr., Dawn Lalor, Ruby Fowler and others
Interested Party:
NACS - The Association for Convenience & Petroleum Retailing, Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers of America, Miscellaneous Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association and others
Not Classified By Court:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), Bonnie Anderson, Melissa Holyoak and others
Petitioner:
Law Offices of George A. Barton, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
