Cases 11 - 20 of 200
MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00801
Petitioner:
NIKKIA MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Arnold v. US
as 23-1951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ARNOLD, SUSAN BOLEK, H. DRAKE GEBHARD and others
Plaintiff:
B&D FARMS, INC., H. KENT EUHUS LIVING TRUST, DIANA EUHUS LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Martin v. McDonough
as 23-1876
Claimant:
GROVER MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
BARBATA et al
as 1:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
CHARLES G. BARBATA, BEACOM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, GERHARD P. DRUMM and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Perry v. PTO
as 23-1812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. PERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, WENDY GARBER, Director Patent Technology Center, DARNELL JAYNE, Director and others
HAMMOND-MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00588
Petitioner:
GLENDINA HAMMOND-MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01937
Petitioner:
LORRAINE MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01936
Petitioner:
LORRAINE MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
