Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Sivak v. Burdick et al
as 3:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Roger Burdick, Amanda K. Brailsford, William A. Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Fletcher et al
as 3:2023cv06249
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
William A. Fletcher and Mark J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sivak v. Bennet et al
as 3:2023cv06248
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Mark J. Bennet and William A. Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Bennett et al
as 3:2023cv06255
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Mark J. Bennett and William A. Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06111
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06014
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Albert Veenstra, III, et al v. Idaho State Board of Correctio, et al
as 17-35952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT PETE VEENSTRA III, MIGUEL CHARLES JOYNER and WILLIAM JERMAINE FLETCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION, Executive Department of the State of Idaho, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Executive Department of the State of Idaho, DEBBIE FIELD, Appointed member of teh ISBC sued in her official capacity and others
William Fletcher v. Randy Blade
as 17-35925
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JERMAINE FLETCHER
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY BLADES, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
