Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sherratt v. Nelson, et al
as 19-4073
Respondent / Appellee:
SHANE NELSON, Warden, UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE and UTAH SUPREME COURT
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT
Sherratt v. Utah Department of Corrections, et al
as 13-4061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UTAH STATE PRISON, UTAH CONTRACT ATTORNEYS and others
Sherratt v. Utah Board of Pardons & Parole, et al
as 11-4174
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT
Respondent - Appellee:
UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE, STEVEN TURLEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF UTAH
Sherratt v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv01091
Plaintiff:
William Henry Sherratt
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections, Utah State Prison, Utah Contract Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherratt v. USA
as 2:2010cv00255
Petitioner:
William Henry Sherratt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherratt v. Utah State Prison, et al
as 10-4041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
UTAH STATE PRISON, UTAH STATE PRISON MAILROOM and UTAH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Sherratt v. Utah State Prison, et al
as 10-4042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
UTAH STATE PRISON, STEVEN TURLEY, Warden, SHARON D'AMICO, Lieutenant and others
Sherratt v. Friel, et al
as 10-4018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
CLINT FRIEL, old Warden, STEVEN TURLEY, new Warden, MICHAEL CHABRIES, Utah Department of Corrections Director and others
Sherratt v. Friel
as 07-4228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
CLINT FRIEL, Warden
Sherratt v. Braithwaite, et al
as 07-4168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT T. BRAITHWAITE, DAVID DOXEY and MARK GOWER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
