Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HUNGERFORD v. GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv00093
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM P CERVONE and MARY E DAVIS
Plaintiff:
STEVEN WAYNE HUNGERFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hungerford v. Gainesville Police Department et al
as 5:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Hungerford
Defendant:
Gainesville Police Department, Mary E. David and William P. Cervone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. CERVONE et al
as 1:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
DARREN N CLARK, SR
Defendant:
WILLIAM P CERVONE and RALPH D GRABEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. First Credit Union et al
as 8:2013cv01368
Plaintiff:
Obadiah S. Dillard
Defendant:
First Credit Union, Lawanda Goodman, Sonya Renee Leath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. First Credit Union Bank et al
as 8:2013cv01150
Plaintiff:
Obadiah Savoy Dillard
Defendant:
First Credit Union Bank, William P. Cervone, Ronald Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILLARD v. RESCHKE
as 1:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
OBADIAH SAVOY DILLARD
Defendant:
BRIAN R RESCHKE, RONALD SIMPSON, M J KRPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. State Of Florida et al
as 2:2010cv00780
Plaintiff:
Derrick Devon Griffin
Defendant:
State Of Florida, Peggy A. Quince, Edwin B. Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. NOLAN et al
as 1:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
LARRY TYRONE SCOTT
Defendant:
JENNIFER NOLAN, JAMES FISHER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. MCCOLLUM et al
as 1:2008cv00131
Petitioner:
DANNY A GREEN
Respondent:
BILL MCCOLLUM and WILLIAM P CERVONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. McCullum et al
as 3:2008cv00606
Petitioner:
Danny A. Green
Respondent:
Bill McCullum and William P. Cervone
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
