Cases 41 - 50 of 777
Ngwa Bih v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61178
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Ngwa Benardine Bih
Laura Gonzalez-Lumbi, et al v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61179
Petitioner:
Laura Katiela Gonzalez-Lumbi and Emely Gonzalez
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Kirishan Kuganeswaran v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61171
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kirishan Kuganeswaran
Carmen Vargas-Funez, et al v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61175
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Cristopher Jose Bustillo-Vargas and Carmen Leticia Vargas-Funez
Mario Ramirez Rojas v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61172
Petitioner:
Mario Rene Ramirez Rojas
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Denis Villafranca-Medina v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61176
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Denis Javier Villafranca-Medina
Maria Domingo-Torrez v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61173
Petitioner:
Maria Domingo-Torrez
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Scott Hardin v. ATF, et al
as 20-6380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT A. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Attorneys Office, WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, an agency of the Department of Justice and others
Cristibel Gutierrez-De Rivas, et al v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61169
Petitioner:
Maria Belen Rivas-Gutierrez and Cristibel Gutierrez-De Rivas
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Bobby Eneugwu, et al v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61162
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Odera Obinna Eneugwu and Bobby Onyeka Eneugwu
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
