Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2021cv00579
Defendant:
Judge Peter C. Dedded, Judge Ronda Trupp, Judge David Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bonilla v. Dembin et al
as 3:2021cv00396
Defendant:
Judge Michael S. Berg, Judge Larry Alan Burns, Judge Michael D. Dembin and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bonilla v. Clay
as 4:2020cv04304
Defendant:
Michael E. Delllastrillo, Toni Cantil-Sakauye, Andrew G. Schopler and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Anello et al
as 3:2020cv00111
Defendant:
John A. Houston, Michael M. Anello, Cathy A. Bencivenco and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Daniels et al v. Hayes et al
as 3:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Ellington Daniels and Diane Daniels
Defendant:
William Q. Hayes and JOHN DOES (Investors) 1-10,000
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubino v. Hayes et al
as 5:2014cv05553
Plaintiff:
Robert Rubino
Defendant:
William Q. Hayes, Roger T. Benitez, Gonzalo P. Curiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of
as 3:2011cv00969
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Citizens Review Board on Police Practices, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Pacific View Motel, Sicuia Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Calhoun v. County, San Diego et al
as 3:2010cv02489
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
County, San Diego, Michael M Anello , San Diego Public Law Library and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calhoun v. County, San Diego et al
as 3:2010cv02263
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
County, San Diego, William Q. Hayes , Irma E. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
