Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Harris v. Dreesen et al
as 2:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
F. Dreesen, Morin, Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trost v. Cooke et al
as 3:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Roy Trost and Daisy Lynne Meadows
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, M.H. Hayman, Don Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
Steven Sisolak, Barbara Cegavske, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iske v. H.D.S.P. et al
as 2:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Harlan Iske
Defendant:
H.D.S.P., H.D.S.P. Medical Staff, Sonya Corriton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Rigney et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Sanchez
Defendant:
Chet Rigney, Curtis Rigney, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasmine Sanchez v. William Reubart
as 22-15841
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Lofton v. Ely State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Donte Lofton
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, Warden William Gittere, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zane Floyd v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99004
Petitioner / Appellant:
ZANE M. FLOYD
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and AARON FORD, Attorney General
Dixon v. Reubart
as 3:2022cv00183
Petitioner:
Steven Lawrence Dixon
Respondent:
William Reubart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberto Durand v. Nevada, State of, et al
as 22-15561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA, STATE OF, ELY STATE PRISON, EXUM, Dr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
