Cases 1 - 10 of 1,605
Russell v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Ryan Russell
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Chris Thomas, Craig E. Boelte and others
Shook v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00489
Petitioner:
Michael Sean Shook
Respondent:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Small v. Johnson
as 4:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
William Oris Small, Jr
Defendant:
Allana Nicole Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Burleson et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 5:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Dennis Burleson and Yvonne Burleson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Lyle William Wells, III and Trey Wells Insurance Agency, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Angel v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Kandy Angel
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jiles v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
William Ray Jiles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Norman v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Marcell Jeron Norman
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 5:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
William Bradley and Suann Bradley
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 5:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Karlena Williams
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
