Cases 41 - 50 of 419
El-Bey et al v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Noble El-Bey and Tania Williams
Defendant:
Leanna Lambdin, Casandra Tesik, Melanie E. Gavisk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elias v. Loveland, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Harris Elias
Defendant:
Loveland, City of, William Gates and Antolina Hill
Jones v. Reis et al
as 1:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Jones
Defendant:
Brian Reis, Chris Van Wagenen, Marshall Currier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rathbun v. US Department of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
William Scott Rathbun
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Veterans Health Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schlough v. City and County of Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Schlough
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, Paul (I) Pazen, Vince (I) Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Valdez et al
as 1:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Jones and Nicholas Kazarinoff
Defendant:
Richard Valdez, Richard (I) Valdez, Derek Woodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Montgomery v. Cohn et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
William Montgomery
Defendant:
Brett Cohn and Trevor Cuaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Becker v. Chlopek et al
as 1:2021cv03270
Plaintiff:
Susanne Becker
Defendant:
J. Chlopek, M. Freelend, M. Harding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
