Cases 1 - 10 of 856
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hudson v. HomeGood's Corp et al
as 0:2024cv60739
Plaintiff:
Brandon R. Hudson
Defendant:
HomeGood's Corp and Raheem Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Crosby v. Town of Indian River Shores
as 2:2024cv14092
Plaintiff:
William B. Crosby, III
Defendant:
Town of Indian River Shores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goolst v. Raymono et al
as 9:2024cv80277
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Steven Goolst
Defendant:
Cynthia Raymono and William Raimono
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Loper et al v. Lukis et al
as 1:2024cv20604
Plaintiff:
Council President ELIZABETH A LOPER, Alderman KEITH J BLACK, Alderman KATHLEEN M GROSS and others
Defendant:
Commissioner PATRICIA PETRONE, Ashley Lukis, Michelle Anchors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOUAD v. WILLIAMS et al
as 0:2024cv60247
Plaintiff:
OMAR MOHSEN IBRAHIM FOUAD
Defendant:
NASHAN WILLIAMS, VINCENT CORNELIUS, COREY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
