Cases 1 - 10 of 2,039
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe v. Hardwick et al
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert A. Hardwick, Matthew Cline, Joshua Woolsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELILLA v. PLANTE et al
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
VICTOR BELILLA
Defendant:
WILLIAM PLANTE and NATALIA AZIZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OSBORNE v. MCCORMICK
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
ALAN OSBORNE
Defendant:
CLAYTON ADKINSON, WILLIAM MCCORMICK and CLAY ADKINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATACCHIERO v. MCCORMICK
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
DAN MATACCHIERO
Defendant:
CLAY ADKINSON and WILLIAM MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antoine-Denard Williams, Sr. and Virginia Loretta Baker
Defendant:
State of Florida, Joseph Biden, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Windsor v. Pepperman et al
as 5:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
William Michael Windsor
Defendant:
Judge Carla R. Pepperman, Emily Curington and Gary Cooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudson v. HomeGood's Corp et al
as 0:2024cv60739
Plaintiff:
Brandon R. Hudson
Defendant:
HomeGood's Corp and Raheem Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy v. Jung
as 8:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Quinton McCoy
Defendant:
William Frederic Jung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bigge v. C. W. Roberts Contracting, Incorporated
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
William Bigge
Defendant:
C. W. Roberts Contracting, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
