Cases 21 - 30 of 78
FAULKNER et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48486
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FLANAGAN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48479
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GEIGER et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48521
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RADUNZ et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48532
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GAARD et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48537
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KRISTIANSEN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48039
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ROSS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44136
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITHWICK et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42838
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLMES et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44559
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOLMES , WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BRADY et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv44051
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
