Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wine & Canvas Development, LLC v. Christopher Muylle
as 15-3658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WINE & CANVAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER MUYLLE
Wine & Canvas Development, LLC v. Donald McCracken, et al
as 15-3082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WINE & CANVAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD MCCRACKEN, ANTHONY SCOTT and TAMRA MCCRACKEN, originally named as Tamara Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
THEODORE WEISSER, CHRISTOPHER MUYLLE, YN CANVAS CA, LLC, doing business as WWW.ART-UNCORKED.COM and others
Wine & Canvas Development, LLC v. Theodore Weisser, et al
as 15-2088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WINE & CANVAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD MCCRACKEN, ANTHONY SCOTT and TAMARA SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
THEODORE WEISSER, CHRISTOPHER MUYLLE, YN CANVAS CA, LLC, doing business as WWW.ART-UNCORKED.COM and others
Wine & Canvas Development, LLC v. Roberts et al
as 2:2014cv00912
Defendant:
Las Vegas Bungee, Inc., Avraham Levi and Rachel Roberts
Plaintiff:
Wine & Canvas Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Duncanson et al v. Wine & Canvas Development, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv00704
Plaintiff:
Megan Aroon Duncanson and Sheri Marie Wiseman
Defendant:
Wine & Canvas Development, LLC , Sarah Marie Wathen , Joshua Michael Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
WINE & CANVAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2012cv01752
Defendant:
LAS VEGAS BUNGEE, INC., AVRAHAM LEVI and RACHEL ROBERTS
Plaintiff:
WINE & CANVAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
WINE & CANVAS DEVELOPMENT LLC v. WEISSER et al
as 1:2011cv01598
Defendant:
ART UNCORKED, CHRISTOPHER MUYLLE, THEODORE WEISSER and others
Plaintiff:
WINE & CANVAS DEVELOPMENT LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
