Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Meiller et al v. Winnebago Industries Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03527
Plaintiff:
Ronald Meiller and Karen Meiller
Defendant:
Winnebago Industries Incorporated, La Mesa RV Center Incorporated (Yuma) and Winnebago Industries Incorporated doing business as Winnebago of Indiana LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Loomis et al v. Winnebago Industries Incorporated
as 3:2017cv08071
Plaintiff:
Marsha Loomis and Garth Loomis
Defendant:
Winnebago Industries Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Pynn et al v. Winnebago Industries Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv02080
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pynn and Shannon Pynn
Defendant:
Winnebago Industries Incorporated , Cummins Power Generation Incorporated and La Mesa RV Center Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Fletcher et al v. Winnebago Industries Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv02624
Plaintiff:
Carl Fletcher and Karly Fletcher
Defendant:
Winnebago Industries Incorporated and La Mesa RV Center Incorporated (Yuma)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Steven Federico v. Freedomroads RV, Incorporated, et al
as 11-2044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN FEDERICO
Defendant - Appellee:
FREEDOMROADS RV, INCORPORATED, doing business as CAMPING WORLD RV SALES, WINNEBAGO INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Steven Federico v. Freedomroads RV, Incorporated, et al
as 11-2044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN FEDERICO
Defendant / Appellee:
FREEDOMROADS RV, INCORPORATED, doing business as CAMPING WORLD RV SALES, WINNEBAGO INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Bruce Tammi v. Porsche Cars North America, In
as 07-1832
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRUCE A. TAMMI
Defendant - Appellant:
PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Not Party - Amicus Curiae:
ALLIANCE OF AUTO MANUFACTURERS, INCORPORATED, RECREATION VEHICLE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, MONACO COACH CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
