Cases 1 - 10 of 18
United States of America v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01744
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2020cv05050
Respondent:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Petitioner:
Milt Cyphert and Laura Cyphert
COUNTY OF OCEAN, NEW JERSEY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv17138
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, BEVERLY SACKLER, H. D. SMITH WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF OCEAN, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv13684
Defendant:
BEVERLY SACKLER, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ANDA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GOGGANS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00404
Plaintiff:
KAREEM A. GOGGANS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JONES v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2016cv01135
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 73 U.S.C. § 201
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al v. City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
as 1:2015mc00242
Petitioner:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Michael T. Duke
Respondent:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
BRAURMAN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC et al
as 2:2015cv06324
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BRAURMAN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC and SAM'S WEST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Morning Song Bird Food Litigation
as 1:2015mc00077
Petitioner:
Laura Cyphert , Milt Cyphert , Barbara Cowin and others
Respondent:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
KONOPCA v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 3:2015cv01019
Plaintiff:
JAN KONOPCA
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
