Cases 1 - 10 of 331
MCLAIN v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Shelby McLain
Defendant:
WALMART, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
COVINGTON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
RONALD COVINGTON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PEREZ v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
GLORIA PEREZ
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCCLUSKY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MCCLUSKY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CORNELIUS et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Marcia Cornelius and Kenneth Cornelius
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ESTATE OF GLENN PAUL KOEHRING v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF GLENN PAUL KOEHRING and ESTATE OF GLENN PAUL KOEHRING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DARGE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
MELISSA DARGE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MACMILLAN v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
CAROL MACMILLAN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ROGGE v. WAL-MART
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Rogge and BARBARA A. ROGGE
Defendant:
WAL-MART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ABDELMALAK v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
IVIT ABDELMALAK
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
