Cases 41 - 50 of 389
SMITH v. DANSONS US, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
GARY SMITH
Defendant:
DANSONS US, LLC, WALMART, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
LIZOTTE et al v. TYSON FOODS, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
LORIN LIZOTTE and JERRAD LIZOTTE
Defendant:
TYSON FOODS, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CORNES v. SAM'S EAST, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01264
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL CORNES
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC. and WAL-MART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
FREEMAN v. WALMART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2022cv00943
Plaintiff:
VICKIE FREEMAN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WALMART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MENDOZA v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
BLANCA ISELA MENDOZA
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
NELIS v. SAM'S EAST INC D/B/A et al
as 1:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
ROBIN NELIS
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST INC D/B/A doing business as SAM'S CLUB NO. 6325 and WAL-MART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HUMPHREY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 4:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HUMPHREY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WHITE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
PAMELA WHITE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOBBS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
DAVID DOBBS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, POWERHOUSE RETAIL SERVICES, LLC and IMPERIAL REMODELING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRADLEY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2021cv02916
Plaintiff:
DEBRA BRADLEY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
