Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Cintas Corporation No. 2 et al
as 2:2022cv00806
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Wal-Mart Stores
Plaintiff:
Adrianne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Anderson v. Cintas Corporation No. 2 et al
as 4:2022cv00101
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Wal-Mart Stores
Plaintiff:
Adrianne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Gillard v. Walmart Stores et al
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Miranda Gillard
Defendant:
Walmart Stores an Arkansas Corporation doing business as Wal-Mart and Wal-Mart Stores East doing business as Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
IHC Health Services v. Wal-Mart Stores et al
as 2:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
IHC Health Services doing business as Saint George Regional Hospital
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores and Associates Health and Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roskelley et al v. Wal-Mart Stores
as 1:2019cv00065
Plaintiff:
Krystal Roskelley and Kirk Roskelley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00957
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Price v. Wal Mart et al
as 4:2018cv00071
Defendant:
Kurt Harbin and Wal Mart
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
