Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Schuman et al v. Energizer Holding, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv02093
Plaintiff: Kimberly Schuman and Kyle Kelley
Defendant: Energizer Holding, Inc. and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Portable Power, Inc. v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv02091
Plaintiff: Portable Power, Inc.
Defendant: Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Copeland et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv02087
Plaintiff: Don Copeland, Joseph Murray, Carol Smith and others
Defendant: Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
City of Clearlake et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv06212
Defendant: Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff: City of Clearlake and The People of the State of California, by and through the City of Clearlake
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Lakeport et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv04007
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: The People of the State of California, acting by and through the City of Lakeport, City of Lakeport and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Fraser et al v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02733
Defendant: Save Mart Supermarkets, Rembrandt Enterprises Inc, Albertson's Companies Inc and others
Plaintiff: Eugene Elander, Iris Delgado, Kat Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City Of San Jose v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv04529
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: City Of San Jose and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03224
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tule River Indian Tribe of California v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03222
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: TULE RIVER INDIAN TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Del Norte v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02732
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: County of Del Norte
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?