Cases 1 - 10 of 13
RIVERS III v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2024cv02919
Plaintiff:
LOUIS N. RIVERS III
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HUNTER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2017cv03841
Plaintiff:
TINA HUNTER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
FREEMAN et al v. SAM'S EAST INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01786
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE FREEMAN and BRADLEY WARD
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST INC. , SAM'S WEST INC. , SAM'S CLUB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
QUILES et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2016cv09479
Plaintiff:
SUNDEL QUILES , VICTORIA J MARTIN , JAMES M SHEA and others
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
STEPHAN v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 2:2016cv04363
Plaintiff:
BRIDGET STEPHAN
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DURANT v. WAL-MART et al
as 1:2016cv02514
Plaintiff:
KISHARA DURANT
Defendant:
WAL-MART and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
HOWARD v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv07622
Plaintiff:
SAMIKA HOWARD
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HOUSEY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01337
Plaintiff:
SHANEIS HOUSEY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , KELLY AYERS-ROSSER , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
FUTURE CARE CONSULTANTS, L.L.C. v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv02707
Plaintiff:
FUTURE CARE CONSULTANTS, L.L.C.
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DR. JOSEPH TAURO v. BLUE ADVANTAGE ADMINISTRATORS OF ARKANSAS et al
as 3:2013cv03081
Plaintiff:
DR. JOSEPH TAURO
Defendant:
BLUE ADVANTAGE ADMINISTRATORS OF ARKANSAS and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
