Cases 11 - 20 of 26
DE BARNES v. WALGREENS - STORE NO. 6367 et al
as 2:2014cv05446
Plaintiff:
TANIA NEPOMUCENO DE BARNES
Defendant:
WALGREENS - STORE NO. 6367 and WALGREENS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
DEBOSE v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03027
Plaintiff:
ANGELA W. DEBOSE
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and THE WALGREEN COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv06967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
MICHAEL v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 2:2012cv01161
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO. , WALGREEN COMPANY , WALGREEN'S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MICHAEL et al v. WALGREEN COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv06680
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL and MARY MICHAEL
Defendant:
WALGREEN COMPANY , WALGREEN'S , WALGREEN'S PHARMACY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv06296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CRAWFORD v. WALGREEN COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv05721
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WALGREEN COMPANY , WALGREEN'S , WALGREEN'S PHARMACY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURNETT v. WALGREEN COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv04064
Plaintiff:
DENISE BURNETT
Defendant:
WALGREEN COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROGERS-BELL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv03736
Plaintiff:
MARY ROGERS-BELL and OSSIE BELL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION , GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, GLAXO WELLCOME UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEVINE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv03735
Plaintiff:
ANNA M LEVINE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION , GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, GLAXO WELLCOME UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
