Cases 1 - 10 of 45
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J. ROOKS
Defendant:
TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. REED et al
as 1:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
MICAH ANDERSON
Defendant:
EVE KLINDERA REED, JEREMY J BROGGI, WILEY REIN LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENT v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02189
Defendant:
J. F. CARAWAY, FRANK LARA, BUNKER and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEARING v. WALKER et al
as 1:2019cv00938
Defendant:
WALKER, TOOMEY and TERRY DANIEL
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE DEARING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLING v. FULTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OF FULTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2019cv00115
Defendant:
WALKER, S. MARTIN, FULTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OF FULTON COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. SNELLING, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. TILLERSON
as 1:2017cv02359
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS R. WALKER
Defendant:
REX TILLERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WALKER v. PAVLIK et al
as 1:2016cv00410
Plaintiff:
TERRY WALKER
Defendant:
RONALD A. PAVLIK, JR., E. MONTESINO, A. LEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALLOY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Petitioner:
GERALD J. MALLOY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TODD v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2015cv01278
Plaintiff:
JEROME EUGENE TODD
Defendant:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, GEORGE WALKER BUSH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
