Cases 31 - 40 of 81
WALKER v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv01849
Petitioner:
RASHID WALKER
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. KIRBY
as 1:2016cv00561
Petitioner:
BYRON WALKER
Respondent:
KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCGILLVARY v. UNION COUNTY NEW JERSEY, et. al
as 2:2015cv08840
Petitioner:
CALEB L MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY NEW JERSEY, UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, GRACE H. PARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. NEWARK NJ POLICE DEPARTMENT 4TH DISTRICT
as 2:2015cv07311
Defendant:
NEWARK NJ POLICE DEPARTMENT 4TH DISTRICT, OFFICER WALKER, LT. GONZALES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2015cv07073
Plaintiff:
TERRY J. WALKER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER, RAYMOND C. SKRADZINSKI, ELBERT JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. KIRBY
as 1:2015cv04038
Petitioner:
BYRON WALKER
Respondent:
KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WALKER v. THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2015cv03632
Plaintiff:
TERRY WALKER
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER, THE COUNTY OF SALEM, THE SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN/ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. COOK et al
as 1:2015cv01293
Plaintiff:
MORRIS M. COOPER
Defendant:
TERRENCE COOK, MICHAEL V. LUCIANO, PHILIP G. PAGANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2014cv06802
Plaintiff:
TYREEN WALKER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBSTER et al v. N.J. PAROLE
as 3:2014cv06739
Plaintiff:
JAMES WEBSTER, ANTHONY PEARSON, TYREEN WALKER and others
Defendant:
N.J. PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
