Cases 1 - 10 of 752
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
Andres-Zacarias, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1640
Petitioner:
GERARDO MIGUEL ANDRES-ZACARIAS and WALTER JOSE ANDRES-CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Primrose
as 24-1462
Defendant:
WALTER GLENN PRIMROSE and Bobby Edward Fort
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hopgood v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 24-911
Plaintiff:
WALTER HOPGOOD, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Spina v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO FRANCOIS SPINA, II, also named as Antonio Spina and Antonio Francois Spina
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY, WALTER HENSLEY, UNKNOWN STICKLEY and others
Vasquez Lopez v. Garland
as 23-3667
Petitioner:
WALTER VASQUEZ LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Betschart, et al. v. Garrett, et al.
as 23-3573
Petitioner:
WALTER BETSCHART, JOSHUA SHANE BARTLETT, CALEB AIONA and others
Respondent:
PATRICK GARRETT, SHERIFF, Washington County Sheriff, in his official capacity and STATE OF OREGON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
