Cases 1 - 10 of 488
Amos v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Harold Ray Amos
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benjamin v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Johnny C. Benjamin, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jeremy Achey v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 23-13964
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEREMY P. ACHEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Marshall Williams v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 23-13759
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Oriyomi Aloba v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 23-13386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORIYOMI ALOBA and ORIYOMI SADDIQ ALOBA
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Scotland v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00603
Petitioner:
Thomas Allen Scotland
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odeh v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00590
Petitioner:
Mohamed Saddiq Odeh, Abumoath, Novreldine and others
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Harris v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 23-13137
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT MARVIN HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Achey v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00575
Petitioner:
Jeremy P. Achey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Conyers, Jr. v. Ayers FNU, et al
as 23-12898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CONYERS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
AYERS FNU, KITCHEN FNU, PERKINS FNU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
