Cases 11 - 20 of 489
Robert Conyers, Jr. v. Ayers FNU, et al
as 23-12898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CONYERS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
AYERS FNU, KITCHEN FNU, PERKINS FNU and others
Brown v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00423
Petitioner:
Chedrick V. Brown
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Montero v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Guillermo Perez Montero
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ruggiero v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00323
Petitioner:
Vincent Ruggiero
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Samuels v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
David Samuels
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marshall WilliamsIn re: Marshall Williams
as 23-11239
Petitioner:
In re: MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Ervin v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Gary D. Ervin
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garraway v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Mitchell Garraway
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cancel-Hernandez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
Nestor M. Cancel-Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Qaasim v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Saleel Z. Qaasim
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
