Cases 41 - 50 of 184
In re: James Cline
as 16-3829
Movant:
In re: JAMES M. CLINE
Respondent:
WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Smith v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 3:2016cv00308
Petitioner:
Theodore W Smith, III
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
In re: Jerone McDougald
as 16-3816
Movant:
In re: JERONE MCDOUGALD
Respondent:
WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Gerald Thompson v. OH Dept Rehabilitation & Corr, et al
as 16-3827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS, WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DON MORGAN and others
Gerald Thompson v. OH Dept Rehabilitation & Corr, et al
as 16-3777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS, WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DON MORGAN and others
Baxstrumn v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2016cv00744
Petitioner:
Damiyon M. Baxstrumn
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malone v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 2:2016cv00639
Petitioner:
Donald K. Malone
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDougald v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2016cv00565
Petitioner:
Jerone McDougald
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gerald Thompson v. OH Dept of Rehabilitation, et al
as 16-3512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS, WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DON MORGAN and others
Pullen v. Cool et al
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
William Cool, Cynthia Davis, David Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
