Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Vincent v. Mims
as 3:2024cv01340
Petitioner:
Richard A. Vincent
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oberholzer v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01277
Petitioner:
Barend Oberholzer
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Knutson v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv01022
Defendant:
United States America, Warden Carlton, Biden and others
Petitioner:
Robin L Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hopkins v. Jacquez et al
as 3:2024cv01065
Respondent:
FCI Sheridan and Warden Jacquez
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00386
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Carico v. Traquez et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Curtis Brent Carico
Defendant:
Warden Traquez, Lieutenant Michaelson, Lieutenant Roughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Roughton et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Hopkins
Defendant:
Lt. Roughton, Warden Barron, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01951
Petitioner:
Steven Bryan
Respondent:
Warden Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beltran v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01888
Petitioner:
Anthony Joseph Beltran
Respondent:
Warden Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sierra v. Moreno et al
as 3:2023cv01396
Plaintiff:
Jorge R. Sierra
Defendant:
SIS Officer Moreno, Captain J. Cerone, Warden Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
