Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lee v. Ives et al
as 3:2017cv01218
Defendant:
4B Unit Team, Prior Warden Feather, FCI Sheridan's Warden Ives and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Feather et al
as 3:2016cv02024
Defendant:
Administrator of the kitchen, Warden Feather, Recreation Supervisor Gogers and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00355
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00058
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01713
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bennett v. Feathers et al
as 3:2014cv01667
Plaintiff:
James J. Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Feathers and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00158
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-36027
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01881
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01305
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
