Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Recktenwald v. Legrand et al
as 3:2015cv00490
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden Legrand
Petitioner:
Paul Recktenwald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crisman v. LeGrande
as 3:2015cv00397
Petitioner:
Brian Crisman
Respondent:
Warden LeGrande
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sutton v. LeGrand
as 3:2015cv00394
Respondent:
Warden LeGrand
Petitioner:
Kevin D. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sutton v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2015cv00353
Respondent:
Warden LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kevin D. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCune v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2015cv00142
Defendant:
James Cox, Warden LeGrand and Nevada Parole Board
Plaintiff:
Don McCune
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingaman v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2015cv00046
Petitioner:
Craig Bingaman
Respondent:
Warden LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dozier v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2015cv00043
Petitioner:
Esau Dozier
Respondent:
Warden LeGrand, Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State Of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Legrand et al
as 3:2014cv00678
Petitioner:
Kenneth Don Barrett
Respondent:
Warden Legrand and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crisman v. LeGrande et al
as 3:2014cv00636
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden LeGrande
Petitioner:
Brian Crisman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monroe v. Walker et al
as 3:2014cv00515
Defendant:
Warden Legrand and C/O Walker
Plaintiff:
Ronald Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
